MANAGEMENT OF INFANTS WITH AMBIGUOUS GENITALIA
The current management of children born with ambiguous genetalia by physicians in consultation with parents at many hospitals around the country calls into view a number of far-reaching ethical implications.
Who has the right to decide whether a child should have irreversible surgery on genitals or gonadal tissue purely for cosmetic appearance at an age before the child is able to give informed consent? Why is it important to have a 'normal' body? What are the long-term impacts of deciding gender for a child before he or she has a chance to assert his or her own identity? What are the longer-term physiological impacts (such as loss of erotic sensation and orgasmic function, scarring, unnecessary vaginal dilation, lifelong hormone replacement therapy, sterility and osteoporosis )?
Do not intersex children have the same rights as other ‘normal’ children, which doctors would never perform such risky surgeries upon? It is perhaps a given that no Western doctor would ever perform or condone female circumcision nowadays, for instance.
It is our experience that surgery does not 'cure' intersex. In fact, surgery during infancy and early childhood can have many unfavourable consequences.
To see an outline of the way we feel children with intersex variations ought to be treated, click here (pdf version). Also check out preferred treatment paradigm for children with intersex variations (pdf format). The AIS Support Group Australia Inc/ supports calls for a moratorium on non-urgent medical intervention. This includes gonadectomies on children with AIS and clitoral recession.
Below are a range of articles on the management of infants with ambiguous genetalia, which include both medical papers and articles published in the popular media.
Poem By Graham...
"Toweling off a sparkling clean baby!" by Lab2112, 2007. Creative Commons license.
By Anne Tamar-Mattis, November 07 2008, Endocrine Today
Medical decision-making and the child with a DSD (intersex condition). Perhaps the first question isn't what to decide, but who should decide.
Ethical Principles for the Management of Infants with Disorders of Sex Development.
Gillam LH, Hewitt JK, Warne GL. Children's Bioethics Centre, Royal Children's Hospital, Melbourne, Vic., Australia. Horm Res Paediatr. 2010 Aug 12.
Abstract: The Fifth World Congress on Family Law and Children's Rights (Halifax, August 2009) adopted a resolution endorsing a new set of ethical guidelines for the management of infants and children with disorders of sex development (DSD). The ethical principles developed by our group were the basis for the Halifax Resolution. In this paper, we outline these principles and explain their basis. The principles are intended as the ethical foundation for treatment decisions for DSD, especially decisions about type and timing of genital surgery for infants and young children. These principles were formulated by an analytic review of clinician reasoning in particular cases, in relation to established principles of bioethics, in a process consistent with the Rawlsian concept of reflective equilibrium as the method for building ethical theory. The principles we propose are: (1) minimising physical risk to child; (2) minimising psychosocial risk to child; (3) preserving potential for fertility; (4) preserving or promoting capacity to have satisfying sexual relations; (5) leaving options open for the future, and (6) respecting the parents' wishes and beliefs.
By Rebelo, E., Szabo, C. P., Pitcher, G., Child Health Care 2008 12: p. 49-59
With his wrestler's build and deep voice, it is hard to believe that Hussein Rabei could ever be mistaken for a woman, but in the Middle East cultural norms can blind people to the glaringly obvious.
May 30, 2007 in Scientific American
Eric Vilain discusses the biology and politics of mixed-sex individuals, arguing that terms such as "hermaphrodite" and "intersex" are vague and hurtful.
By Sally Lehrman, May 20, 2007 in Scientific American
Babies born with mixed sex organs often get immediate surgery. New genetic studies, Eric Vilain says, should force a rethinking about sex assignment and gender identity.
By Lee, P. A. 2006 in Pediatrics. 118 (2): e488-e500.
The birth of an intersex child prompts a long-term management strategy that involves myriad professionals working with the family. There has been progress in diagnosis, surgical techniques, understanding psychosocial issues, and recognizing and accepting the place of patient advocacy. The Lawson Wilkins Pediatric Endocrine Society and the European Society for Paediatric Endocrinology considered it timely to review the management of intersex disorders from a broad perspective, review data on longer-term outcome, and formulate proposals for future studies. The methodology comprised establishing a number of working groups, the membership of which was drawn from 50 international experts in the field. The groups prepared previous written responses to a defined set of questions resulting from evidence-based review of the literature. At a subsequent gathering of participants, a framework for a consensus document was agreed. This article constitutes its final form.
By O'Rourke, M. The Weekend Australian. March 19-20, 2005.
When the midwife passed Andrew and Megan O'Brien their new baby, they were thrilled to notice that he was a boy, even though an earlier ultrasound had foretold a girl.
By Liao, D. L.-M. and P. M. Boyle 2004. The Psychologist. 17 (8): 459-462
Dr Liao and Professor Boyle look at clinical options for intersex people, making the case that it is more public understanding rather than more 'treatment' that is needed, in order for future generations of intersex people to have real choices in how they want to manage their difference - without societal pressure to have their body surgically sexed, often time and again.
By Martin, P. L. 2002. In Duke Journal of Gender Law and Policy. 10: pp.135-170.
What determines sexual identity? Basic assumptions about human gender, sexual identity and sexual re-assignment, and what makes a person male or female, or man or woman, are being re-evaluated in light of David Reimer's experience and subsequent revelations from intersexed individuals, concomitant with new medical procedures, theories and standards.
Paediatric Surgeons from the Royal Children's Hospital Melbourne have published a paper supporting the practices they are currently involved in reviewing. Is there are conflict of interest? Is their hypothesis sustainable?
Tuesday, 17 September 2002 by Anna Salleh - ABC Science Online
A long-term study of intersex adults, who were born with genitalia that made it difficult to know if they were a boy or a girl, has furthered the controversy about current treatment practices.
By Ford & Kishka-Kamari. 2001. Yale Law and Policy Review 19 (469).
Yale Law and Policy Review examines surgical liability.... "Surgeons who perform genetic normalizing surgery, whether on an emergency basis or at the behest of the intersexed infant's parents, should be aware that, because genital-normalizing surgery is not necessary nor proven beneficial for the infant with clitoromegaly or micropenis, the required elements of legal informed consent are likely to have not been met. In light of the questionable scientific basis behind its use, the lack of follow-up data on its benefits, and the overwhelming evidence of its negative physical and psychological results for many intersexuals, a moratorium should be declared on the use of defenseless infants as the experimental subjects of genital-normalizing surgery."
By Christine Toomey in The Weekend Australian magazine supplement to The Weekend Australian newspaper, 8-9 December, 2001.
Imagine if you'd grown up thinking you were female and discovered at 20 that, genetically, you were a man. Imagine you are a happily married man of 29, whose only problem is that your wife is failing to conceive, and that tests reveal the problem lies with you - your genes are 100 per cent female. Or you discover your parents had been advised by doctors never to tell you there had been doubts about your gender, or that surgeons operated on you and did not tell you the real reason for the surgery. These people were born with a medical condition called intersex, and their stories are not as unusual as you might suppose. The large brown envelope that made sense of Melissa's troubled past arrived in the post shortly after her 18th birthday.
Genetically and physically, male babies born with a condition called "micropenis" are more likely to achieve psychological and sexual well-being in adulthood if raised male, according to a new study by researchers at Johns Hopkins and three other centers.
By Sarah Creighton and Catherine Minto, Department of Gynaecology, University College London Hospitals
Warns that cliotral surgery, such as clitoral recession or excision, should be delayed.
By Martha Coventry, Ms. Magazine, Oct-Nov 2000.
It's a Girl!..... or is it? When there's doubt why are surgeons calling the shots?
By By Sally Lehrman, April 1999.
An article about the debates around infant surgical assignment.
By Kenneth Kipnis, Ph.D. & Milton Diamond, Ph.D., University of Hawai`i that appeared in The Journal of Clinical Ethics, Volume 9 (4):398-410 Winter 1998.
It has been standard pediatric practice to recommend surgery for infants with ambiguous genitalia or loss of the penis. The parents of these patients are told to raise them without ambiguity and, in consequence, many adults who have had these operations in infancy have never been candidly informed of their medical histories. This management approach, which can involve a reassignment of sex, has its basis in research done on hermaphrodites and a single set of identical twins originally tracked more than two decades ago. The current article reviews this practice and its epistemic foundations. It is argued that there should be a moratorium on such surgery; that the medical profession should complete comprehensive lookback studies to assess the outcomes of past interventions; and that efforts should be made to undo the effects of past deception.
By Milton Diamond, Ph.D. & H. Keith Sigmundson, M.D. in Pediatric & Adolescent Medicine, 1997
The authors suggest guidelines for surgeons and treating specialists to follow "based on our experiences, the input of some trusted colleagues, the comments of intersexed persons of various etiologies and the best interpretation of our reading of the literature."Top of page
Copyright Notice: Copyright in all of the materials on this website is owned by the AIS Support Group Australia Inc. unless otherwise indicated. Unless otherwise stated, the AIS Support Group Australia Inc. authorises copying of any material published by the AIS Support Group Australia Inc. placed on this website for non-commercial use only, provided that any copied material from the website retains all copyright or other proprietary notices, contact details of the AISSGA and any disclaimer contained thereon. Personal biographies are not to be copied or distributed without the prior permission of the AISSGA.
Trademark Notice: The AIS Support Group Australia logo and artwork is the property of the AIS Support Group Australia Inc.
Disclaimer Notice: The content of the AIS Support Group Australia Inc. website is provided for information purposes only. The AIS Support Group Australia Inc. makes no claim as to the accuracy of the content contained in the website. The AIS Support Group Australia Inc. makes no representation as the accuracy or any other aspect of the information contained on servers linked to the website via hyperlinks from the AIS Support Group Australia Inc. This information is provided on the basis that all persons accessing the website undertake the responsibility for assessing the accuracy of its content and that they rely on it entirely at their own risk.
Last update: 6 December, 2014
Website Design: hartflicker